사용자토론:Pandeism Fish
새 주제
안녕하세요, Pandeism Fish님! 우리 모두의 백과사전 위키백과에 기여해 주셔서 감사합니다. 하지만 귀하께서 범신론 문서에 해 주신 편집은 위키백과에 어울리지 않는 내용이기 때문에 문서를 편집하시기 전의 상태로 되돌려 놓았습니다.
이전의 편집 내용은 편집 역사에 기록되어 있으니 다시 한 번 편집 내용을 확인해 주세요. 궁금한 점이 있으시면 위키백과 도움말을 참고하시거나 다른 사용자에게 질문해 주시면 됩니다. 연습이나 실험은 연습장에서 하실 수 있습니다. 감사합니다.
Yeom0609 2007년 5월 6일 (일) 08:18 (KST)
Pandeism Fish님, 잠시 주목해 주세요. Pandeism Fish님이 범신론 문서에 해 주신 편집은 위키백과의 정책과 지침에 맞지 않는 부분이 있어서 문서를 편집하시기 전의 상태로 되돌려 놓았습니다.
이전의 편집 내용은 편집 역사에 기록되어 있으니 다시 한번 편집 내용을 확인해 주세요. 길라잡이나 질문방 등을 참고하시면 작성하신 내용이 왜 잘못되었는지를 더 쉽게 확인하실 수 있습니다. 이러한 행동이 계속될 경우 관리자에 의하여 편집이 차단되거나 제한될 수 있습니다. 좋은 편집을 부탁드립니다.
Yeom0609 2007년 5월 6일 (일) 09:24 (KST)
Hi, sorry, what the hell do I know, I don't speak Korean. But could you perhaps fix those articles rather than just delete, delete, delete?
- Who can't explain pandeism or pantheism with a sentence?--Kakaru 2007년 5월 6일 (일) 10:31 (KST)
- Pandeism (범이신론) and pantheism (범신론) are pretty straight forward doctrines. I mean there's plenty more that can be said about either, but the basic thing is:
- Pantheism = God is the Universe and the Universe is God, and there is nothing more to God than that. The idea is in Vedic philosophy, also discussed by Greek philosophers, and resurged in the 1700s.
- Pandeism = God started out as God and then became the Universe, so there's no God left (until the Universe ends, i.e. deism, 이신론). Idea was discussed by Greek philosophers, then put in writing by John Scottus Eriugena in the 860s, but his writings were lost for centuries, and it resurged in the 1850s.
- (Sorry, I can't speak English well.) Why? Your editing was wrong. When I see your editing, Your writing has wrong contents. Do you understand?--Kys951 2007년 5월 6일 (일) 11:30 (KST)
- Here is Korean wikipedia. So you should write articles in Korean. If you can't, the articles will be deleted.--Kakaru 2007년 5월 6일 (일) 11:36 (KST)
- Well I don't, but these are basic philosophical subjects which should have an article in every Wikipedia, so please correct them. Thanks.
- At least you could have wrote about a paragraph in English and asked someone to translate into Korean in the edit summary. (Even though I doubt it will be done any time soon.) Yeom0609 2007년 5월 6일 (월) 21:41 (KST)
- Ok, well I might do that. Thanks. Pandeism Fish 2007년 5월 9일 (수) 12:57 (KST)
- At least you could have wrote about a paragraph in English and asked someone to translate into Korean in the edit summary. (Even though I doubt it will be done any time soon.) Yeom0609 2007년 5월 6일 (월) 21:41 (KST)
- Well I don't, but these are basic philosophical subjects which should have an article in every Wikipedia, so please correct them. Thanks.
- Pandeism (범이신론) and pantheism (범신론) are pretty straight forward doctrines. I mean there's plenty more that can be said about either, but the basic thing is:
(Regarding your comment in my User talk page)
Unfortunately, Korean Wikipedia has much less manpower than its English counterpart does. So if you write a messy English article about an abstract philosophical concept here, it is likely that there will be nobody who is interested and capable enough to fix it. So the article may remain messy for many months, giving the readers (most of whom have limited English reading skill) an impression that Wikipedia has low quality, rather than any useful knowledge. It is why we delete such articles ASAP.
Everything that grows has its own pace, including Korean Wikipedia. Please patiently wait for its growth. I promise that it will have excellent articles about pantheism and pandeism in some day. --Acepectif 2007년 5월 8일 (화) 04:42 (KST)
이신론 은 범신론 범신론 과 범이신론 과 연결되고.
I reverted your edits on 틀:신앙 체계. (See [1]) It is a template of Korean Wikipedia, so in principle, it must be written in Korean. When I created the template by translating it from en:, I supplied English terms within parentheses for those which seem to lack standard translations, in order to prevent confusions. However, for example, translating Agnosticism as 불가지론 is well-established, and it can be found in almost any respectable English-Korean dictionary. --Acepectif 2007년 5월 10일 (금) 17:24 (KST)
- Looks unbalanced to me, but I'll respect the principles of this site. I have a question -- terms lacking standard translation, how do you determine how those should be translated? Pandeism Fish 2007년 5월 11일 (금) 07:48 (KST)
- We have a discussion about it, even though it takes forever to decide anything. Yeom0609 2007년 5월 11일 (금) 08:57 (KST)
- Ok, thanks for the info. Pandeism Fish 2007년 5월 11일 (토) 15:36 (KST)
- My most 'new' translations are not really new. For example, 'pantheism = 범신론' and 'deism = 이신론' are standard. I combined them, and made a translation 'pandeism = 범이신론'. In some cases, I googled the English terms with 'Search pages written in Korean' option selected. When my translations are 'really new', I didn't use them in the template and just put them in the talk page. (For example, 'theopanism = 신범론', 'transtheism = 초월신론'.) --Acepectif 2007년 5월 12일 (토) 07:41 (KST)
- Thanks, I have suggested some more. Pandeism Fish 2007년 5월 12일 (일) 16:27 (KST)
- My most 'new' translations are not really new. For example, 'pantheism = 범신론' and 'deism = 이신론' are standard. I combined them, and made a translation 'pandeism = 범이신론'. In some cases, I googled the English terms with 'Search pages written in Korean' option selected. When my translations are 'really new', I didn't use them in the template and just put them in the talk page. (For example, 'theopanism = 신범론', 'transtheism = 초월신론'.) --Acepectif 2007년 5월 12일 (토) 07:41 (KST)
- Ok, thanks for the info. Pandeism Fish 2007년 5월 11일 (토) 15:36 (KST)
- We have a discussion about it, even though it takes forever to decide anything. Yeom0609 2007년 5월 11일 (금) 08:57 (KST)
No new talk is going on over here, I see....